NettetPart VI: Personal. Jonathan Glover. Alan Ryan - 2010 - In N. Ann Davis, Richard Keshen & Jeff McMahan (eds.), Ethics and Humanity: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Glover. Oxford University Press. NettetJonathan Glover (born 1941) is a British philosopher known for his studies on ethics. He was educated at Tonbridge School, later going on to Corpus Christi College, Oxford. He was a fellow and tutor in philosophy at New College, Oxford. He currently teaches ethics at King’s College London.
Jonathan Glover A Philosophy Website
Nettetby Jonathan Glover. ( 55 ) $12.99. Renowned moral philosopher Jonathan Glover confronts the brutal history of the twentieth century to unravel the mystery of why so many atrocities occurred. In a new preface, Glover brings the book through the post-9/11 era and into our own time—and asks whether humankind can "weaken the grip war has on … Nettet23. feb. 2006 · Progress in genetic and reproductive technology now offers us the possibility of choosing what kinds of children we do and don't have. Should we welcome this power, or should we fear its implications? There is no ethical question more urgent than this: we may be at a turning-point in the history of humanity. The renowned moral … blade and soul pinchy wheel of fate
Jonathan Glover A Philosophy Website - Home Core Platform
NettetJohn Gardner FBA (23 March 1965 – 11 July 2024) was a Scottish legal philosopher. He was senior research fellow at All Souls College, Oxford University, and prior to that the Professor of Jurisprudence at the University of Oxford and a fellow of University College, Oxford . Life and career [ edit] Nettet"Entretien avec Jeff McMahan sur Jonathan Glover et l’éthique du faire-mourir," (“An Interview with Jeff McMahan on Jonathan Glover and the Ethics of Killing”), in French and English, Canadian Journal of Bioethics, 2024, 2(1): 68-76. “Eating Meat,” in David Edmonds, ed., Ethics and the Contemporary World (London: Routledge, 2024). Nettet13. feb. 1986 · To the Editors:. The central pro-life argument is simpler and more forceful than Jonathan Glover recognizes [NYR, May 30, 1985].It begins with a proposition accepted on both sides of the abortion debate: healthy infants have a powerful claim to our care and protection, and we wrong them seriously if we kill them. fpc sterling co